Dear All
Just to say that posts will start again in August on the Teaching Induction Blog.
Look forward to talking with you then.
cheers
Kym
Wednesday, 29 June 2016
Sunday, 26 June 2016
To assess or not to assess?

We have insufficient 'evidence' that professional
development can DIRECTLY improve student learning, although there is evidence
(perhaps not enough) that those who have undertaken longer programs have higher
student evaluations, and are more 'student-centred' in their teaching
approaches.
But should we 'assess' staff in an induction program? And
what form should that assessment take?
I would like to suggest that we consider self and peer
assessment at least. As 'postgraduates' our staff should be relatively mature
in their ability to discern and honestly assess their own learning, if we have
fairly explicit learning objectives or outcomes, not something vague like
'shows a positive disposition to student-centred learning'.
But how would we construct a peer assessment? If the
program is mainly online, it is RELATIVELY difficult to 'test' attitudes, and
knowledge and skills, all of which make up the 'learning' we'd expect. We
wouldn't want an 'essay' would we? But a Discussion Board wouldn't be an
adequate form of testing either.
I'm not sure of the answers here, but I think it would be
a useful exercise to ask 'participants' to devise a form of 'test' that might
be appropriate for peer assessment. Any thoughts?
Liu, N. & Carless, D.
(2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment, Teaching in
Higher Education, 11:3, 279-290, DOI: 10.1080/13562510600680582
Yoni Ryan
Adjunct Professor in Higher Education: QUT,
U
Tasmania Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA) Learning and
Teaching Unit
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)